HOME PAGE  ::  THE WATCH CABINET  ::  GLOSSARY  ::  ESCAPEMENTS  ::   ENGLISH WATCH REPAIR   :;   HALLMARKS   ::  LINKS



WILLIAM LISTER, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Early English lever, c. 1835

Image of lister_front.jpg
Image of lister_movt2.jpg

English fusee lever watch by William Lister, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.   Gilt brass full-plate movement of deep calibre with screwed backplate, large bright steel balance and cock engraved PATENT and Lever Detach'd;  signed on barrel bridge W. Lister / NEWCASTLE UPON TINE / No. 5067.   Silver consular case (much worn, with escutcheon almost obliterated), hallmarked London 1862 and signed IT (James Thickbroom of Clerkenwell, London).   Off-white enamel dial with roman chapter-ring, marked PATENT (several hairlines).   Gilt spade-&-pointer hands.   High-domed bevelled glass, severely scratched.   Diameter 55mm.


At first glance this watch has nothing (except its rather battered condition) to distinguish it from the other early English levers on this site (e.g. Johnson, Field, Inskip), but it has some unusual features.   The back-plate is held on the pillars by screws rather than by the usual tapered brass pins passing through bosses;  this in my experience is quite unparalleled on a full-plate fusee watch, although half- and three-quarter-plates were often constructed in this way.   Moreover the pillars have been redistributed, the one under the cock being moved to the left  this means that when dismantling the watch one can remove the backplate without disturbing the balance.

Although the case was certainly custom-made for the movement (it is stamped with the serial number), I believe it is not the original one;  the style of the movement is at least 25 years earlier than the hallmark date.   Possibly the watch began life in a pair-case and was modernised by an early owner.

Image of lister_back.jpg
Image of lister_fusee.jpg

This watch seems to have led a remarkably hard life.   Left The back of the case is dented and scarred, and at some time the bow has been violently jack-knifed against the back, leaving the two indentations seen here.   Right The original fusee (now replaced) has had four teeth torn clean off and several others damaged.   How the balance and train survived this kind of treatment is an utter mystery.   And yet, as I write (June 2003), this watch is the strongest-running and most trouble-free of all my English watches.

Image of lister_dial.jpg

William Lister of Newcastle, who was active at least as early as 1815, seems to have been something more than the average provincial retailer.   He is recorded as having advertised marine chronometers for sale, which undoubtedly shows enterprise even if (as is likely enough) they were bought in from London or Liverpool.   Whoever the actual maker was, this movement surely shows an independent mind at work, and it seems a pity that the practical ideas described above (like that other heresy of the time, the ‘left-handed’ layout as shown here), failed to make headway against the inflexibility of thinking that stifled the English trade as the century proceeded.